A federal employment lawsuit that seeks class action status was filed May 5, 2022 against Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits. The lawsuit against the distributor’s primary LLC and its Texas operation was filed in Federal District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division.
The lead plaintiff in the case, Southern Glazer’s employee Savannah Perez, charged that the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by allegedly failing to make required overtime payments to her and its other salaried beverage sales consultants who worked more than 40 hours per week.
[premium content]
The full article text & the complete court complaint file are available to premium subscribers who can go directly to the full version by logging in here:
A Look Inside The Southern Glazer’s Sales Consultant Duties & Compensation
According to the Perez complaint, sales consultants were required to: [premium content]. For this, and other duties outlined below, the complaint states that Perez was paid $[redacted] per year.
Goals & Incentives
[premium content]
Job details
[premium content]
Potential Misinterpretation:
The complaint filed on behalf of Perez filed states:
“42. Plaintiff and Collective Members regularly worked more than forty (40) hours in each workweek. However, Defendant paid Plaintiff and Collective Members a salary for all hours worked after forty (40) hours in each workweek.
“43. In other words, while paying Plaintiff and Collective Members a salary, Defendants did not pay Plaintiff and Collective Members one-and-one-half her regular rate for the hours Plaintiff and Collective Members worked over forty (40) in a workweek.”
One interpretation:
(a) Sales consultants were not paid at all for overtime (nothing beyond their annual salaries) for work performed more than 40 hours/week?
A second interpretation
(b) Sales consultants were paid at an hourly rate (based their base salaries) for work performed more than 40 hours/week? But not time-and-a-half?
One might conclude that “a” is the correct interpretation, but a different reading might conclude that “b” is the operative meaning.
Wine Industry Insight emailed the attorneys who filed the case on behalf of Perez, and asked for a clarification. The attorneys — Drew Herrmann and Allison Herrmann at the Fort Worth firm of Hermann Law — did not reply.
Court Document – [premium content]
- ECF-1- SouthernGlazers-Perez – Complaint – 050422.pdf
Not a Wine Executive News subscriber?
Subscribe to Wine Executive News now, and get the rest of this original article along with everything else on the site every day, including original documents, spreadsheets,and source materials for just $29.99 per month or $209 per year.
New Subscriber Info
You can always contact me directly at: lewis.perdue@wineindustryinsight.com or by replying to this email.
When you sign up for premium, I always check to see if you are also getting the free News Fetch. If not, I sign you up so you will get the news quickly.
3 More places where you can find VIP premium content
Every article that contains premium content will usually be the top link in the daily News Fetch unless some monumental news bumps it to #2.
For your convenience and future reference, all of the News Fetch emails are automatically converted to web pages and can be found here: NewsFetch Newsletter Archives.
In addition, articles that contain premium content will also be in the "Features" category on the Wine Industry Insight web site.
Why 2 billing systems?
Because our billing company of the past nine years was bought by a company that does not accept American Express, we have had to change our subscription process, and the method of accessing premium content. (Here’s more about that.)