This is a 10/31/19 UPDATE to: Bryant Family Vineyards case against financial consultant booted out of San Francisco, transferred to NY

 

Attorneys for Bryant Family Vineyards have made a last ditch attempt to keep their lawsuit against consultant Lauren Ridenhour from being transferred to New York.

 

The Bryant attorneys have asked the San Francisco Federal District Court to delay the transfer until after the U.S. District Court for the Sourhern District of New York makes a decision on whether or not to allow Ridenhour’s lawsuit to proceed against Donald I. Bryant Jr., and his wife, Bettina Sulser Bryant.

 

The filings for Wine Executive News Premium Subscribers are here:

• Proposed Order Granting Application to Stay
• Declaration of Lori Sambol Brody ISO Application for Stay

Premium Subscribers Log-In Here:

• CCBill premium subscribers, please click this link.
• Stripe premium subscribers, please click this link

Previous Wine Industry Insight coverage:

• Bryant Family Vineyards case against financial consultant booted out of San Francisco court, transferred to NY

• Sulser Bryant sues to silence the whistleblower who once saved her $3 million

• SLAPP Shot? How Sulser Bryant’s San Francisco lawsuit against her former financial consultant may violate state law
• Bryant Winery lawyer issues wandering letter filled with vague unsubstantiated claims and asks for a retraction.
• Federal court judge denies Bryant Family Vineyard gag order for former financial consultant
• Bryant Family Vineyards’ Financial Consultant Amends Complaint, Gets Sued by Bryant Alleging Non-Disclosure Violation
• Valuable oral contract guidance to be had in Bryant Family federal lawsuit
• Bryant Family Vineyards facing serious financial accusations in federal court

Not a Wine Executive News Subscriber?

Subscribe to Wine Executive News now, and get the rest of this original article along with everything else on the site every day, including original documents, spreadsheets,and source materials for just $29.99 per month or $209 per year

30 more full Ridenhour and Bryant litigation court documents for premium subscribers

• San Francisco Federal Judge’s order granting Ridenhour’s motion to transfer
• San Francisco Federal Judge’s order granting Ridenhour’s motion to transfer
• Ridenhour complaint-032219
• Ridenhour complaint-Amended-042219
• Ridenhour complaint-Amended-Exhibit-042219
• Response to defendant srequest for premotion conference-060619
• Bryant-V-Ridenhour-Complaint- 073019
• Bryant-V-Ridenhour-Complaint-Exhibita-073019
• Second amended complaint-Ridenhour-073119
• Complaint amended-Exhibita-073119
• Complaint amended-Exhibitb-073119
• Complaint amended-Exhibitc-073119
• Complaint amended-Exhibitd-073119
• Complaint amended-Exhibite-073119
• Declaration Of Bettina Sulser Bryant In Support Of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction-081919
• Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction-081919
• Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction-081919
• [Proposed] (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction 1322660.1-081919
• Declaration Of Keith J. Wesley In Support Of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For (1) Temporary Restraining Order And (2) Order To Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction-081919
• Order Re Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For Temporary Restraining Order-081920
• Defendant-Ridenhour-Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Plaintiff-Application For A Tro-08/21/19
• Judge order-Ex parte application for TRO-082319
• Stipulation-On-Confidential-Information-09-03-19
• Plaintiff’s-Bryant-Ex-Parte -Application-Etc-091119
• Plaintiff ridenhour-Memorandum-Of-Law-In-Opposition-To-Defendantbryant-Motion-To-Dismiss-09/13/19
• Second-Amended-Complaint-Exhibits-Ridenhour-Opposition-To-Dismissal-09/13/19
• Order-Denying-Plaintiff-Ex-Parte-Application-091319
• Declaration-Of-Bettina-Sulser-Bryant-Opposition-To-Defendant-Lauren-Ridenhour-Motion-To-Dismiss-Complaint-09/20/19
• Declaration Of Pearl Zuchlewski In Opposition To Plaintiff’s Application For A Tro- 09/20/19
• Defendant Ridenhour Reply Memorandum In Support Of Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint-092719
• Defendant-Bryant-Reply Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint-092719

 

Not a Wine Executive News subscriber?

 Subscribe to Wine Executive News now, and get the rest of this original article along with everything else on the site every day, including original documents, spreadsheets,and source materials for just $29.99 per month or $209 per year

---

---

---

New Subscriber Info

---

You can always contact me directly at: lewis.perdue@wineindustryinsight.com or by replying to this email.


When you sign up for premium, I always check to see if you are also getting the free News Fetch. If not, I sign you up so you will get the news quickly.

3 More places where you can find VIP premium content

Every article that contains premium content will usually be the top link in the daily News Fetch unless some monumental news bumps it to #2.

For your convenience and future reference, all of the News Fetch emails are automatically converted to web pages and can be found here: NewsFetch Newsletter Archives.

In addition, articles that contain premium content will also be in the "Features" category on the Wine Industry Insight web site.


Why 2 billing systems?


Because our billing company of the past nine years was bought by a company that does not accept American Express, we have had to change our subscription process, and the method of accessing premium content. (Here’s more about that.)